Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 76.4 against 72.2. Motorola Droid Turbo is a noticeably older and thicker device than the Moto G Fast, but Motorola managed to build it a bit lighter anyway. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11, giving you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a little faster processing unit than Moto G Fast, because although it has less CPU cores (although they are faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot higher amount of pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Fast takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography.
Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.