Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Even though Motorola DROID Turbo is notably older and thicker than the Moto G Fast, it's construction is still just a bit lighter. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse video quality and a back-facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Moto G Fast features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Fast has a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.