Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Pearl white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Motorola Edge 50's body is extremely newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G Fast. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a way better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a little bit larger display, a much higher pixels quantity per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1220 x 2712px. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Moto G Fast has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.