Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Pearl white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is much better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Both devices in this review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. Motorola Moto G Stylus's design has the same thickness than the Moto G Fast, but it is just a little heavier.
Moto G Stylus counts with a much better looking display than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a higher screen pixel density. The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a processor that is very similar to Moto G Fast's processing unit, and although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto G Stylus features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has more internal storage capacity. The Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a way better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Moto G Fast.
Moto G Stylus costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.