Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is much better than Moto G Fast, getting a 79.8 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact that Moto Z4 is older than Moto G Fast, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z4 has an older 10 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a better looking display than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way better pixels density. The Moto G Fast and the Moto Z4 both have extremely similar CPUs, and although the Moto Z4 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto Z4 has a superior camera than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto Z4 also has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos.
Moto Z4 features a much greater storage for apps and games than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Fast counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Fast. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto G Fast, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.