Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro is better than Moto G Fast, getting a general score of 79.9 against 72.2. The OPPO Find X3 Pro is a newer and just a little bit thinner device than the Moto G Fast, but it's a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a way higher pixels count per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a lot better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate, a much better resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.