Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A12 is better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with a score of 80.3 against 72.2. The Galaxy A12 construction is a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Fast, and both were released only a couple months apart. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy A12 has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A12 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A12 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a little sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a quite bigger display, a quite better 720 x 1600 resolution and a bit greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A12 captures slightly better photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A12 features improved battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.