Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Pearl white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 268 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is better than Moto G Fast, with a score of 84.7 against 72.2. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Moto G Fast counts with Android 11 OS. The Galaxy A32 design has the same thickness than Moto G Fast, but it's a little bit heavier. The Galaxy A32's processor is very similar to Motorola Moto G Fast's processor, and although the Galaxy A32 has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A32 counts with a display that's just as good as Moto G Fast's screen, although the Galaxy A32 also has a quite bigger display, a little bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 720 x 1600. Galaxy A32 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 features a little bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.