Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is better than the Moto G Fast, having a general score of 82.3 against 72.2. Galaxy A60's construction is thinner and lighter than the Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released around 12 months before. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
The Galaxy A60 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A60 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Moto G Fast shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A60. Both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size back camera sensor, a F1.7 diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a 16 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy A60 features slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Moto G Fast has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.