Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a global score of 84.2, which is much better than the Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. Although the Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than the Moto G Fast, it's design is thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a much higher display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 3 GB more RAM. The Moto G Fast shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels, and they both have the same back camera sensor size and a same size camera aperture, the Moto G Fast also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Moto G Fast, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.