Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a a little lighter and thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, although they were released only 0 months apart. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with all the same OS features.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a better display density.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.