Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Pearl white | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is better than Moto G Fast, with a score of 84.9 against 72.2. Galaxy A80 is a better device than Moto G Fast, we must tell that it's also an older, just a little thicker and heavier device. Galaxy A80 features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite larger display and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A80 has a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A80 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.