Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Moto G Fast, with a 90.5 score against 72.2. The Galaxy A90 5G body is just a bit thinner than the Moto G Fast, although it's just a bit heavier and was released only 9 months before. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while Moto G Fast counts with Android 11 OS.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a little bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A90 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a little faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A90 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.