Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11. Although Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is much older than the Motorola Moto G Fast, it's design is noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter.
Galaxy C9 Pro and Motorola Moto G Fast have quite similar processing units, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a greater display pixel density.
The Moto G Fast shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a 16 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Moto G Fast also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a lot higher video resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a battery performance that's very similar to the battery performance in Moto G Fast.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.