Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should offer identical operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy M30s construction is just a little thinner and a little lighter than Motorola Moto G Fast, even though they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a better display than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better count of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy M30s features a bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy M30s also has 32 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy M30s counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M30s also has more RAM memory. Galaxy M30s counts with a really longer battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy M30s has a better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.