Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Pearl white | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is much better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS. Even being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy M31s's design is just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than Moto G Fast. Galaxy M31s has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M31s has a little faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has more RAM.
Galaxy M31s takes much better photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.