Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Pearl white | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is a lot better than Moto G Fast's general score of 72.2. The Galaxy Note9 design is just a little bit thinner than Moto G Fast, but it's a little heavier and was released just 22 months before. Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Note9 also has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a lot higher pixels quantity per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note9 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note9 has a battery life that's very similar to the battery lifetime in Moto G Fast. Galaxy Note9 captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a larger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.