Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, having an 81.5 score against 72.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Fast.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a bit larger screen, way more pixels per display inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3080px. The Moto G Fast has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S23 Ultra features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra also has a camera with a much higher 200 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra features greater battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.