Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 205.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has a score of 77.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. The Galaxy S4 is an older phone than Moto G Fast, but it's notably lighter and thinner anyway. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S4 has a newer 4.4.2 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11, providing the user some nice extra features.
Galaxy S4 counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G Fast counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S4, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Fast also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Fast counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and 1 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G Fast takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S4, because it has a more mega pixels camera, a much bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy S4 costs a bit more than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.