Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ1 is a little bit better than Moto G Fast, having a 78.3 score against 72.2. Sony Xperia XZ1's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G Fast, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Sony Xperia XZ1 features a much better looking display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920px resolution and a much greater pixels density.
The Xperia XZ1 features just a bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia XZ1 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xperia XZ1 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G Fast, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G Fast features a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xperia XZ1 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ1 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a better resolution back camera.
Although Sony Xperia XZ1 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Sony Xperia XZ1, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G Fast, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.