Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a score of 77.8 against 72.2. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is notably newer and way thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast's, but it's heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Moto G Fast features a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5700mAh battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way bigger sensor, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way better video definition.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G Fast, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.