Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Pearl white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than Moto G Fast, getting a global score of 78.8 against 72.2. These devices come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the same operating system features. The vivo X60 Pro is a newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G Fast.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite bigger display.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates, a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.