Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the Moto G Fast, getting a general score of 85.5 against 72.2. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older cellphone than the Moto G Fast, but it is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better looking display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a higher display density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back-facing camera, a smaller aperture and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and Moto G Fast feature similar batteries performance.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is way more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.