Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-05-13 | 2017-04-21 |
| 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G LTE's general score of 62.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy S8 is just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G LTE, it's incredibly thinner and also way newer. Galaxy S8 has a better performing processor than Motorola Moto G LTE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy S8 has a bit more vivid display than Moto G LTE, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher pixels count per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Galaxy S8 counts with a much better camera than Moto G LTE, because it has a much more MP back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G LTE, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 56 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a much better battery life than Moto G LTE, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S8 costs a little more money than the Moto G LTE, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.