Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| $ 160.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Moto G Power (2021), having a score of 90.5 against 76.5. Galaxy A90 5G's design is a little bit lighter and thinner than Moto G Power (2021), even though it was released about 17 months before. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a better looking display than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a little larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a greater display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A90 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution and a 0.5 inches sensor, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.