Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 160.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), with a 77.8 score against 76.5. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), it's extremely thinner and also extremely newer. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a larger display, a way higher count of pixels per display inch and a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G Power (2021) features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a more megapixels back camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power (2021). If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power (2021), and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.