Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Moto G Power 5G (2024), getting a 91.8 score against 73. The Galaxy A71 5G body is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G Power 5G (2024), despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Moto G Power 5G (2024) has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better looking display than Moto G Power 5G (2024). Both have a better pixels number per inch in the display, a screen with the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Moto G Power 5G (2024) has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.