Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-12 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Midnight Blue and Pale Lilac | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than Moto G Power 5G (2024), with an 87.1 score against 73. The Galaxy Note9 body weights the same than Moto G Power 5G (2024), but it's just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a sharper screen than Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G Power 5G (2024), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto G Power 5G (2024) counts with better battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25% bigger battery size. Galaxy Note9 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024), because although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.