Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 score. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 OS. IPhone SE (2022) is a newer device, and it is also noticeably lighter and much thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a little worse screen pixel density, a really smaller display and a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels. The iPhone SE (2022) has a quite better hardware performance than Moto G Power, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Moto G Power takes slightly better videos and photos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G Power also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
Moto G Power features a much bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G Power also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Power has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 148% bigger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2022), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Power, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.