Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Smoke black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is better than the Motorola Moto G Power, having a global score of 84.5 against 76.1. IPhone XS Max is an older and just a little heavier phone than Motorola Moto G Power, but Apple was able to build it much thinner anyway. Apple iPhone XS Max features a better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688, a just a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch and a bit bigger screen. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera, a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Power features a really longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Power, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.