Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Google Nexus 6P is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Google Nexus 6P and Motorola Moto G Power have extremely similar processors, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto G Power counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Moto G Power counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45 percent bigger battery size. The Moto G Power features a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking worse quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Power also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.