Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting a score of 81.6 against 76.1. Google Pixel 2's design is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little higher screen pixels density.
The Moto G Power has a greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Power. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G Power takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a camera with a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.