Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. The Google Pixel XL construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Moto G Power, although it was released many years before. Moto G Power counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G Power also has a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel XL features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel count in each inch of screen. Motorola Moto G Power features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Moto G Power has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Power, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.