Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a score of 77, which is a bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. The LG V20 is an noticeably older cellphone than Moto G Power, but it's somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. The LG V20 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixels number in each inch of screen.
Moto G Power features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G Power also has 4 more CPU cores (although slower). Moto G Power captures clearer photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same resolution camera in the back, the same back camera sensor size and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Power also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V20 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V20 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a very superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V20 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.