Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Smoke black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Moto G Power, getting an 83.7 score against 76.1. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G Power, although it was released about 11 months before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen. LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a larger sensor.
The Motorola Moto G Power features longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.