Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Smoke black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 397 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is better than the Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Moto G Power counts with Android 11 OS. The Galaxy A32 body is newer and just a little bit thinner than Moto G Power's, but it's also just a little bit heavier.
Galaxy A32's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Motorola Moto G Power, both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Moto G Power has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1080 x 2300px resolution.
Galaxy A32 features a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G Power and the Samsung Galaxy A32 both have extremely similar batteries duration.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.