Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than the Moto G Power, with an 84.2 score against 76.1. Even though Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than Moto G Power, it's construction is much thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. Motorola Moto G Power takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 128 GB internal storage.
Moto G Power features a much better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.