Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a score of 91.8 against 76.1. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should count with identical OS features. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and Motorola Moto G Power were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is just a little lighter and thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little worse pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a way better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Moto G Power features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.