Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Smoke black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than the Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. Although the Galaxy A80 is older and a bit heavier than the Moto G Power, it's body is still just a little thinner. Galaxy A80 has a display that is very similar to the Moto G Power one, because although the Galaxy A80 has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has more RAM.
Galaxy A80 takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Moto G Power features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.