Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Moto G Power, with a general score of 90.5 against 76.1. Even though the Galaxy A90 5G and Moto G Power were only released with a couple of months difference, Galaxy A90 5G's design is just a little heavier but also thinner. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while Moto G Power counts with Android 11 OS.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G Power features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.