Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is extremely thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G Power, although it was released 3 years before. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version, giving you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
The Moto G Power and the Galaxy C9 Pro feature really similar processors, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto G Power has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power has a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a camera with a 16 mega-pixels, the Moto G Power also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Motorola Moto G Power features improved battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.