Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is much better than Moto G Power's score of 76.1. Although Samsung Galaxy M31 and Moto G Power were released with only 1 months difference, Samsung Galaxy M31 is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M31 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy M31 also has a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy M31's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as Moto G Power's one, both have equal internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M31 captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features longer battery duration than Moto G Power, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.