Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Smoke black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting a general score of 87.1 against 76.1. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is older and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G Power, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. Galaxy Note9 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Note9 also has a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G Power, because although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.