Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ3 is a bit better than Moto G Power, having a 79.6 score against 76.1. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ3 has 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features. The Xperia XZ3 body is a bit lighter than the Moto G Power, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released a little bit more than a year before.
Xperia XZ3 features a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater display density. The Xperia XZ3's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Moto G Power one, both have equal 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Power. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Moto G Power has a very superior battery duration than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3330mAh. Sony Xperia XZ3 takes clearer videos and photos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Sony Xperia XZ3 also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a higher 19 megapixels resolution.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Moto G Power, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.