Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Moto G Power, having a overall score of 77.8 against 76.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version and Moto G Power has Android 11. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much newer and much thinner device than Moto G Power, but it is also just a bit heavier.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto G Power, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit higher display pixel density and a way higher 2200 x 2480px resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much better video quality and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Moto G Power, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G Power, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.