Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a global score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 overall score. The Galaxy A7 (2018) construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the Moto G Stylus (2021), although it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has as much memory capacity for games and applications as Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), they have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution. The Moto G Stylus (2021) features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.