Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), with an 81 score against 79.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is notably older than the Moto G Stylus (2021), it's construction is somewhat lighter and notably thinner. Moto G Stylus (2021) has a little more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a little bit greater pixels amount per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger camera aperture for better photos in low light situations, a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a battery life that's just as good as Moto G Stylus (2021)'s battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.