Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 79.3 against 77.8. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is a way older and noticeably thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a larger screen and a quite higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a more MP back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.