Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), getting a overall score of 91.8 against 82.1. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should count with all the same OS features. The Galaxy A71 5G is an older phone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Galaxy A71 5G has just a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a little greater display pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a superior camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A71 5G is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.