Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a overall score of 79.3 against 76. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older device than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung was able to build it a lot thinner and lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much greater processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 7 less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a lot better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor taking way lower quality photos, and they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.